A few weeks ago, John Piper moderated a lively and spirited discussion on Eschatology with three panelists (pastor-theologians), each representing three distinct views on the millennium: the premillennial view defended by James Hamilton, the amillennial view by Sam Storms, and the postmillennial view by Douglas Wilson.
Piper, though moderating, did not hide the fact that he holds to the premillennial view and even ended up siding with Hamilton at times during the exchange. But he was totally fair in allowing the panelists enough time to explain and defend their positions. It's encouraging to see Christians strongly disagreeing all the while maintaining genuine love and respect for one another as brothers in Christ.
This kind of conversation is simply impossible in many churches. Too often a difference of opinion, especially on eschatology, is tantamount to apostasy. Piper and company have done a good job demonstrating how theological differences can and should be seriously and passionately debated among the people of God.
For audio and video of the event, see here.
0 comments:
Post a Comment